Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X

Abu GARCIA Revo MGX
Spinning
20 Sp/lx
63.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.43 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag6.4kg / 14,11lbs
Weight170g / 6.38oz
Line retireve per crank84 centimeter / 33.07 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandABU GARCIA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €255.20
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size20 SP/L
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/220

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT
Spinning
78.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.63 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank67 centimeter / 26.38 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €189.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X edges out Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the ball bearings (6) and the maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs). Still, Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX holds its own with strengths like a line retrieve per crank of 84 centimeter / 33.07 inch and a durability of 5.5 out of 10, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Abu GARCIA Revo MGX and Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT?
Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX
- 7 out of 10 (84 centimeter / 33.07 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Delphin IXTREK 2000X vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 3000-CX


Shimano FX 3000 FCX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-CXH(U)X


Shimano 21 Sahara FJ C3000HGFJX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2000-PX


Daiwa Freams LT 6000D-HX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2000-PX


Shimano 19 Stella 14000 XGX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X


Shimano Catana 4000 RC vs Shimano FX 3000 FCX


Shimano FX 3000 FCX vs Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X


Delphin SHARX 6000X vs Shimano 19 Stella 14000 XGX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-CXH(U)X vs Shimano 21 Sahara FJ C3000HGFJX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-CXH(U)X vs Delphin HORNET 60X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX


Shimano 19 Stella 14000 XGX vs Delphin SHARX 6000X


Daiwa Freams LT 6000D-HX vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 3000X


Shimano 21 Sahara FJ C3000HGFJX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX


Shimano 19 Stella 14000 XGX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-CXH(U)X


Shimano Catana 4000 RC vs Delphin CarbonIX 1000X


Delphin HORNET 60X vs Delphin SHARX 6000X


Shimano Catana 4000 RC vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX


Shimano Catana 4000 RC vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X
