Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX

Abu GARCIA Revo MGX
Spinning
20 Sp/lx
63.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.43 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag6.4kg / 14,11lbs
Weight170g / 6.38oz
Line retireve per crank84 centimeter / 33.07 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandABU GARCIA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €255.20
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size20 SP/L
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/220

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
79.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.53 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank67 centimeter / 26.38 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €159.80
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX edges out Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the ball bearings (6) and the gear ratio (5.1:1). Still, Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX holds its own with strengths like a line retrieve per crank of 84 centimeter / 33.07 inch and a weight of 170g / 6,38oz, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Abu GARCIA Revo MGX and Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)?
Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX
- 7 out of 10 (84 centimeter / 33.07 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa Freams LT 2500DX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000X


Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2500SX


Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX vs Shimano Stradic GTM 2500 RC Spinning reel with fighting drag


Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000D-CXHX


Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2500SX


Shimano Stradic GTM 2500 RC Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 5000D-C 5000D-CX


Shimano Vanquish FC C2000SCX vs Shimano Catana 1000 RC


Shimano Vanquish FC C2000SCX vs Daiwa Freams LT 2500DX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2500SX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT1000X


Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX vs Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX


Shimano Stradic GTM 2500 RC Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX


Shimano Catana 1000 RC vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT1000X


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CX vs Delphin ELIXIR 5000X


Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX vs Shimano Stradic GTM 2500 RC Spinning reel with fighting drag


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2500SX vs Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX


Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX vs Shimano Catana 1000 RC


Shimano Vanquish FC 4000XGCX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CX


Shimano Stradic GTM 2500 RC Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 6000X


Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX vs Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX
