Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000D(U)X

Abu GARCIA Revo MGX
Spinning
20 Sp/lx
63.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.43 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag6.4kg / 14,11lbs
Weight170g / 6.38oz
Line retireve per crank84 centimeter / 33.07 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandABU GARCIA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €255.20
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size20 SP/L
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/220

Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT
Spinning
56.80 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight180g / 6.35oz
Line retireve per crank68 centimeter / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings5
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €70.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000D(U)
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150
Conclusion
Both Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX and Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000D(U)X perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX offers a line retrieve per crank of 84 centimeter / 33.07 inch, while Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000D(U)X stands out for a ball bearings of 5. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Abu GARCIA Revo MGX and Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT?
Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX
- 7 out of 10 (84 centimeter / 33.07 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000D(U)X
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- Landing a score of 8 out of 10 (5) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI vs Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX


Shimano Sedona FJ 1000FJX vs Daiwa Freams LT 3000D-CX


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 1000D-XH 1000D-XHX


Shimano Sedona 6000 FI vs Shimano 20 Stella 5000 HGX


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX vs Shimano Sahara 3000S R


Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX vs Shimano Sedona 6000 FI


Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 1000FJX


Shimano Sahara 3000S R vs Shimano Sedona FJ 1000FJX


Shimano Sedona 6000 FI vs Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI


Shimano 20 Stella 5000 HGX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X


Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX vs Cormoran Spoon Trout 8PiF


Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X


Daiwa Freams LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano Sedona 6000 FI


Cormoran Spoon Trout 8PiF vs Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX


Shimano Sahara 3000S R vs Shimano Stella FK 1000X


Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI vs Penn FIERCE IV 2500X


Shimano Stella FK 1000X vs Shimano Sedona FJ 1000FJX


Shimano Sahara FJ 500X vs Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX
