Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 1000X

Abu GARCIA Revo MGX
Spinning
20 Sp/lx
63.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.43 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag6.4kg / 14,11lbs
Weight170g / 6.38oz
Line retireve per crank84 centimeter / 33.07 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandABU GARCIA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €255.20
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size20 SP/L
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/220

Daiwa 23 Revros LT
Spinning
54.80 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.32 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight205g / 7.23oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €54.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/150
Conclusion
Both Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX and Daiwa 23 Revros LT 1000X perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX offers a line retrieve per crank of 84 centimeter / 33.07 inch, while Daiwa 23 Revros LT 1000X stands out for a ball bearings of 4. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Abu GARCIA Revo MGX and Daiwa 23 Revros LT?
Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX
- 7 out of 10 (84 centimeter / 33.07 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Daiwa 23 Revros LT 1000X
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Shimano Sedona FJ 1000FJX vs Daiwa BG 4000X


Mitchell 300 4000X vs Daiwa BG 4000X


Mitchell 300 4000X vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CX


Daiwa Ninja LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 4000X


Shimano Sedona FJ 1000FJX vs Shimano Catana FE 4000X


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 3000X vs Shimano Catana FE 4000X


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano Sahara 3000S R


Shimano Catana FE 4000X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX


Shimano Catana FE 4000X vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 4000X


Shimano Sahara 3000S R vs Shimano Catana FE 1000X


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500SFJX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 3000X vs Mitchell 300 4000X


Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x vs Mitchell 300 4000X


Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 3000X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX


Shimano Catana FE 4000X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-CXH(U)X


Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano Sedona FJ 1000FJX
