Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2000X
Abu GARCIA Revo MGX
Spinning
20 Sp/lx
63.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.43 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag6.4kg / 14,11lbs
Weight170g / 6.38oz
Line retireve per crank84 centimeter / 33.07 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandABU GARCIA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €255.20
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size20 SP/L
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/220
Daiwa 23 Revros LT
Spinning
55.00 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.3 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight210g / 7.41oz
Line retireve per crank68 centimeter / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €56.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/150
Conclusion
Both Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX and Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2000X perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX offers a line retrieve per crank of 84 centimeter / 33.07 inch, while Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2000X stands out for a ball bearings of 4. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Abu GARCIA Revo MGX and Daiwa 23 Revros LT?
Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX
- 7 out of 10 (84 centimeter / 33.07 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2000X
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons
Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Sahara 3000S R
Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 HGX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500-XHX
Shimano Sahara 3000S R vs Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X
Shimano Sahara 3000S R vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX
Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 HGFJX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 HGX
Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X
Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X vs Shimano Catana 1000 RC
Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX vs Mitchell 300 4000X
Mitchell 300 4000X vs Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX
Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000X
Shimano FX 1000 FCX vs Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX
Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000X
Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX
Shimano Sahara 3000S R vs Shimano Vanford FA C2500SAX
Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag
Mitchell 300 4000X vs Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX
Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX vs Mitchell 300 4000X
Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 HGFJX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag
Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2500X
Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX