Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX vs Delphin CarbonIX 2000X

Abu GARCIA Revo MGX
Spinning
20 Sp/lx
63.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.43 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag6.4kg / 14,11lbs
Weight170g / 6.38oz
Line retireve per crank84 centimeter / 33.07 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandABU GARCIA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €255.20
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size20 SP/L
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/220

Delphin CarbonIX
Spinning
49.70 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.88 out of 10
Ergonomics6.3 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight210g / 7.41oz
Line retireve per crank0 inch
Ball bearings5+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €42.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.12/227
Conclusion
Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX clearly outshines Delphin CarbonIX 2000X, offering significantly better performance in line retrieve per crank (84 centimeter / 33.07 inch) and maximum drag (6,4kg / 14,11lbs). While Delphin CarbonIX 2000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Abu GARCIA Revo MGX and Delphin CarbonIX?
Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX
- Designed with a light drag at 5.69 out of 10 (6,4kg / 14,11lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
- 7 out of 10 (84 centimeter / 33.07 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Delphin CarbonIX 2000X
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (5+1) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Delphin SHARX 3000X vs Shimano Catana FE 2500X


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX vs Shimano 19 Stella 10000 PGX


Shimano 21 Sahara FJ C3000HGFJX vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000D-CX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CX vs Delphin SHARX 3000X


Daiwa RX LT 2500X vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 5000D-C 5000D-CX


Daiwa BG 2000X vs Shimano Catana FE 2500X


Shimano 21 Sahara FJ C3000HGFJX vs Daiwa RX LT 2500X


Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX vs Shimano Catana FE 2500X


Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX vs Daiwa BG 2000X


Delphin SHARX 3000X vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500X vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX


Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500X vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 1000DX


Shimano Stella FK 2500 HGX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000D-CX


Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CX


Daiwa RX LT 2500X vs Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 5000D-C 5000D-CX vs Daiwa BG 2000X


Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano 21 Sahara FJ C3000HGFJX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500X vs Daiwa RX LT 2500X
