Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX vs Delphin CarbonIX 3000X

Abu GARCIA Revo MGX
Spinning
20 Sp/lx
63.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.43 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag6.4kg / 14,11lbs
Weight170g / 6.38oz
Line retireve per crank84 centimeter / 33.07 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandABU GARCIA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €255.20
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size20 SP/L
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/220

Delphin CarbonIX
Spinning
49.50 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.92 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank0 inch
Ball bearings5+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €44.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/257
Conclusion
Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX clearly outshines Delphin CarbonIX 3000X, offering significantly better performance in line retrieve per crank (84 centimeter / 33.07 inch) and maximum drag (6,4kg / 14,11lbs). While Delphin CarbonIX 3000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Abu GARCIA Revo MGX and Delphin CarbonIX?
Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX
- Designed with a light drag at 5.69 out of 10 (6,4kg / 14,11lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
- 7 out of 10 (84 centimeter / 33.07 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Delphin CarbonIX 3000X
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (5+1) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Shimano 20 Stella 6000 XGX vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000 M HGX


Daiwa BG 8000X vs Shimano Sahara FJ 500X


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX vs Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R


Shimano 21 Sustain 5000 XGFJX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CXHX


Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 2000X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 5000-CX


Shimano Sahara FJ 500X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CXHX


Shimano 20 Stella 6000 XGX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 5000-CX


Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX


Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CXHX


Shimano 19 Stella 14000 XGX vs Daiwa Freams LT 2500DX


Shimano 20 Stella 6000 XGX vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 4000X


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 XGX vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 4000X


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 4000X vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 XGX


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 4000X vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 5000-CX


Shimano 19 Stella 14000 XGX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 5000 XGFJX


Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R vs Shimano Sahara FJ 500X


Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 2000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CXHX


Shimano 19 Stella 14000 XGX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 XGX


Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000 M HGX
