Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX vs Delphin ELIXIR 4000X

Abu GARCIA Revo MGX
Spinning
20 Sp/lx
63.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.43 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag6.4kg / 14,11lbs
Weight170g / 6.38oz
Line retireve per crank84 centimeter / 33.07 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandABU GARCIA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €255.20
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size20 SP/L
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/220

Delphin ELIXIR
Spinning
52.80 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.1 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag-
Weight270g / 9.52oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €19.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/375
Conclusion
Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX edges out Delphin ELIXIR 4000X with slightly better overall performance, especially on the line retrieve per crank (84 centimeter / 33.07 inch) and the maximum drag (6,4kg / 14,11lbs). Still, Delphin ELIXIR 4000X holds its own with strengths like a ball bearings of 3+1 and a gear ratio of 5.0:1, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Abu GARCIA Revo MGX and Delphin ELIXIR?
Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX
- Designed with a light drag at 5.69 out of 10 (6,4kg / 14,11lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
- 7 out of 10 (84 centimeter / 33.07 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Delphin ELIXIR 4000X
- Thanks to its 6.33 out of 10 (5.0:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX vs Daiwa BG 4500X


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500X


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano Stella FK 4000 MX vs Daiwa BG 4500X


Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000S-XH(U)X


Shimano Stella FK 4000 MX vs Shimano Twinpower FD 4000M HG 4000MHGX


Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 HGX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2000D-XH 2000D-XHX vs Shimano Stella FK 4000 MX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX vs Delphin INKS 3000X


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2000D-XH 2000D-XHX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000S-XH(U)X


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000S-XH(U)X


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano Twinpower FD 4000M HG 4000MHGX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2000D-XH 2000D-XHX


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX vs Shimano Twinpower FD 4000M HG 4000MHGX


Shimano Twinpower FD 4000M HG 4000MHGX vs Penn Battle III 6000X


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX vs Shimano 20 Stella 4000 XGX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000S-XH(U)X vs Daiwa BG 4500X


Shimano Vanford FA C3000HGAX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 5000-CX
