Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 1000FJX

Abu GARCIA Revo MGX
Spinning
20 Sp/lx
63.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.43 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag6.4kg / 14,11lbs
Weight170g / 6.38oz
Line retireve per crank84 centimeter / 33.07 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandABU GARCIA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €255.20
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size20 SP/L
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/220

Shimano Sedona FJ
Spinning
55.50 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.28 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight215g / 7.58oz
Line retireve per crank66 centimeter / 25.98 inch
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €52.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000FJ
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/140
Conclusion
Both Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX and Shimano Sedona FJ 1000FJX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX offers a line retrieve per crank of 84 centimeter / 33.07 inch, while Shimano Sedona FJ 1000FJX stands out for a ball bearings of 3+1. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Abu GARCIA Revo MGX and Shimano Sedona FJ?
Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX
- 7 out of 10 (84 centimeter / 33.07 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Shimano Sedona FJ 1000FJX
- Thanks to its 6.33 out of 10 (5.0:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Delphin CarbonIX 2000X


Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT6000X


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 3000X vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano FX 1000 FCX vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 3000X


Penn FIERCE IV 2500X vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CXHX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 19 Certate 3000DX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000X vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 3000X vs Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X


Shimano FX 1000 FCX vs Penn FIERCE IV 2500X


Daiwa 19 Certate 3000DX vs Penn FIERCE IV 2500X


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000X vs Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT6000X vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX


Shimano FX 1000 FCX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000X


Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000X


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 1000DX vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 3000X


Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX vs Shimano FX 1000 FCX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 1000X vs Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X


Penn FIERCE IV 2500X vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CXHX
