Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX vs Shimano Sedona 6000 FI

Abu GARCIA Revo MGX
Spinning
20 Sp/lx
63.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.43 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag6.4kg / 14,11lbs
Weight170g / 6.38oz
Line retireve per crank84 centimeter / 33.07 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandABU GARCIA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €255.20
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size20 SP/L
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/220

Shimano Sedona 6000 FI
Spinning
32.80 out of 100
Value for money2 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio4.6:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.04lbs
Weight425g / 14.99oz
Line retireve per crank83cm / 32.68inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €71.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size6000 FI
- Handle typeHandle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.33/240. 0.37/190, 0.405/160 lb/yds: 12/265, 16/170, 20/120
Conclusion
Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX clearly outshines Shimano Sedona 6000 FI, offering significantly better performance in weight (170g / 6,38oz) and total score (6.36 out of 10). While Shimano Sedona 6000 FI may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Abu GARCIA Revo MGX and Shimano Sedona 6000 FI?
Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX
- With a score like 8.87 out of 10 (170g / 6,38oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Solid value at €255.20, reliable and great performance, it’s a smart choice for a variety of spinning fishing needs
Shimano Sedona 6000 FI
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Shimano Sahara 1000 R vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX


Daiwa Crossfire LT 1000X vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-HX


Delphin IXPERA 2000X vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500X-HX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 4000-C(U)X vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 3000-CX


Delphin IXPERA 2000X vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2000X


Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 HGFJX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 4000-C(U)X


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2000X vs Delphin ELIXIR 5000X


Shimano Sahara 1000 R vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2000X


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-HX vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X


Shimano Vanquish FC C3000XGCX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX


Shimano Sahara 4000 R vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-HX


Daiwa Crossfire LT 1000X vs Delphin HORNET 20X


Daiwa Crossfire LT 1000X vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500X-HX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500X-HX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 HGFJX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 1000DX vs Shimano Vanquish FC C3000XGCX


Delphin IXPERA 2000X vs Shimano Stella FK 2500 S HGX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 3000-CX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 HGFJX


Shimano Stradic FM vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X
