Abu GARCIA SUPERIOR 2500SX vs Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Abu GARCIA SUPERIOR
Spinning
2500sx
63.80 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.2 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight240g / 8.47oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings5
Technical Specifications
- BrandABU GARCIA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €71.20
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500S
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/100

Shimano Ocea Conquest HG
Seafishing
201x
66.70 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.99 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight285g / 10.05oz
Line retireve per crank78 centimeter / 30.71 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSeafishing
- Price range~ €477.10
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size201
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.24/200
Conclusion
Both Abu GARCIA SUPERIOR 2500SX and Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Abu GARCIA SUPERIOR 2500SX offers a gear ratio of 5.2:1, while Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X stands out for a line retrieve per crank of 78 centimeter / 30.71 inch. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Abu GARCIA SUPERIOR and Shimano Ocea Conquest HG?
Abu GARCIA SUPERIOR 2500SX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (5kg / 11,02lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
- Landing a score of 8 out of 10 (5) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Shimano 21 Sahara FJ C3000HGFJX vs Daiwa BG MQ 4000D-XHX


Daiwa BG MQ 3000D-XHX vs Shimano 21 Sahara FJ C3000HGFJX


Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X vs Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 6000 XGX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 1000X


Daiwa BG MQ 4000D-XHX vs Shimano Vanford FA C2500SAX


Shimano Ultegra C3000DX vs Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 10000 PGX


Shimano Vanford FA C2500SAX vs Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 10000 PGX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 10000 PGX


Shimano 21 Sahara FJ C3000HGFJX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500X


Daiwa BG MQ 3000D-XHX vs Daiwa 23 Saltiga 6000-HX


Shimano Complex XR 2500X vs Daiwa BG MQ 4000D-XHX


Shimano Beastmaster 12000 MD vs Penn FIERCE IV 3000X


Daiwa 23 Saltiga 6000-HX vs Shimano Beastmaster 12000 MD


Shimano 21 Sahara FJ C3000HGFJX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000-XHX


Shimano Beastmaster 12000 MD vs Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 6000 XGX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano Vanford FA C2500SAX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500X vs Shimano 21 Stradic SW 6000 PGX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano Stradic SWB 6000XGX


Shimano Vanford FA C2500SAX vs Shimano Complex XR 2500X


Shimano 21 Stradic SW 6000 PGX vs Shimano Complex XR 2500X
