Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X

Abu GARCIA Zenon
Spinning
85.70 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.55 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight135g / 4.76oz
Line retireve per crank63 centimeter / 24.8 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandABU GARCIA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €326.00
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000 S
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.17/100

Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF
Spinning
38.20 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.54 out of 10
Ergonomics6.18 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag2.5kg / 5.51lbs
Weight245g / 8.64oz
Line retireve per crank74 centimeter / 29.13 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandCORMORAN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €22.60
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/250
Conclusion
Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX clearly outshines Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and total score (8.57 out of 10). While Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Abu GARCIA Zenon and Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF?
Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX
- Designed with a light drag at 5 out of 10 (3kg / 6,61lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.57 out of 10 (74 centimeter / 29.13 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Shimano Super 4000 GT RD vs Shimano Sahara 1000 R


Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X vs Daiwa Freams LT 2500DX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000-XHX vs Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2000D-XH 2000D-XHX


Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX


Daiwa BG 6500X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX


Shimano Stradic GTM 3000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Shimano Sahara 3000S R


Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X vs Shimano Super 4000 GT RD


Daiwa Freams LT 2500DX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000-XHX vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000HGAX


Daiwa Crossfire LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 6000DX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 6000DX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX


Shimano Stella FK C 3000 M HGX vs Shimano Stradic GTM 3000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag


Shimano Stradic GTM 3000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Daiwa Freams LT 2500DX


Shimano Vanford FA C3000HGAX vs Daiwa BG 6500X


Shimano Sahara 1000 R vs Shimano Sahara 3000S R


Shimano Sahara 1000 R vs Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X


Shimano Stradic GTM 3000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 6000DX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 1000D-XH 1000D-XHX


Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 6000DX
