Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X

Abu GARCIA Zenon
Spinning
85.70 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.55 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight135g / 4.76oz
Line retireve per crank63 centimeter / 24.8 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandABU GARCIA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €326.00
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000 S
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.17/100

Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF
Spinning
38.20 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.54 out of 10
Ergonomics6.18 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag2.5kg / 5.51lbs
Weight245g / 8.64oz
Line retireve per crank74 centimeter / 29.13 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandCORMORAN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €22.60
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/250
Conclusion
Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX clearly outshines Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and total score (8.57 out of 10). While Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Abu GARCIA Zenon and Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF?
Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX
- Designed with a light drag at 5 out of 10 (3kg / 6,61lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.57 out of 10 (74 centimeter / 29.13 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX vs Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX


Shimano Complex XR C2000X vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Complex XR C2000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 4000X vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-HX vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 3000X


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa RX LT 2500X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500X


Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 3000X vs Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX


Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500X


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500X vs Penn FIERCE IV 2000X


Daiwa Ninja LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX


Daiwa RX LT 2500X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2000 / JB4 0.13MM YELOW 2000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2000 / JB4 0.13MM YELOW 2000X vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX vs Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 HGX vs Shimano Complex XR C2000X


Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-HX


Daiwa RX LT 2500X vs Shimano Sienna 4000X


Penn FIERCE IV 2000X vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 4000X


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500X vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CXHX
