Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.
Abu GARCIA Zenon
Spinning
85.70 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.55 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight135g / 4.76oz
Line retireve per crank63 centimeter / 24.8 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandABU GARCIA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €326.00
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000 S
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.17/100
Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD
Feeder And Match
95.00 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.93 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight305g / 10.76oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €189.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3012
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Both Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX and Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX offers a durability of 9.5 out of 10, while Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X stands out for a ball bearings of 8. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Abu GARCIA Zenon and Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD?
Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X
- This reel provides steady retrieval 79 centimeter / 31.1 inch (6.29 out of 10), good enough for most feeder and match scenarios
- With a ball bearing score of 10 out of 10 (8), this reel feels exceptionally smooth and responsive, an ideal choice for demanding feeder and match fishing
Similar comparisons
Daiwa TD Match 3012X vs Shimano 19 Stella 8000 HGX
Shimano AERO XR C5000X vs Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD
Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X
Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X
Shimano Super 4000 GT RD vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X
Shimano 19 Stella 8000 HGX vs Shimano Super 4000 GT RD
Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX
Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD vs Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX
Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X vs Shimano Sahara 500 FI
Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD vs Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 HGFJX
Shimano 19 Stella 8000 HGX vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX
Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX
Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 4000-CX
Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 4000-CX
Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X
Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX vs Shimano Sahara 500 FI
Shimano AERO XR C5000X vs Shimano 19 Stella 8000 HGX
Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 4000-CX
Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX vs Shimano Aero BB 4000X
Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX