Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX

Abu GARCIA Zenon

Spinning

85.70 out of 100

Value for money4.5 out of 5

Quality classExcellent

Durability9.5 out of 10

Ergonomics6.55 out of 10

Gear ratio5.2:1

Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs

Weight135g / 4.76oz

Line retireve per crank63 centimeter / 24.8 inch

Ball bearings11

Technical Specifications

BrandABU GARCIA
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €326.00
Is saltwater resistantYes
Spare spoolNo
Reel size1000 S
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.17/100

Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT

Spinning

72.20 out of 100

Value for money4 out of 5

Quality classMedium

Durability3.73 out of 10

Ergonomics6.28 out of 10

Gear ratio5.3:1

Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs

Weight215g / 7.58oz

Line retireve per crank80 centimeter / 31.5 inch

Ball bearings6

Technical Specifications

BrandDAIWA
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €96.33
Is saltwater resistantNo
Spare spoolNo
Reel size3000-C
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150

Conclusion

Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX edges out Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the durability (9.5 out of 10) and the total score (8.57 out of 10). Still, Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX holds its own with strengths like a ball bearings of 6 and a maximum drag of 10kg / 22,05lbs, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.

What's the difference between Abu GARCIA Zenon and Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT?

Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX

Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.

Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX

6.43 out of 10 (80 centimeter / 31.5 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency