Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX

Abu GARCIA Zenon
Spinning
85.70 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.55 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight135g / 4.76oz
Line retireve per crank63 centimeter / 24.8 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandABU GARCIA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €326.00
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000 S
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.17/100

Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT
Spinning
72.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.74 out of 10
Ergonomics6.2 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight240g / 8.47oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €98.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX edges out Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the durability (9.5 out of 10) and the total score (8.57 out of 10). Still, Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX holds its own with strengths like a ball bearings of 6 and a maximum drag of 12kg / 26,46lbs, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Abu GARCIA Zenon and Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT?
Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX vs Penn FIERCE IV 3000X


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 HGX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 FJX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2000-PX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 6000X


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2000-PX vs Cormoran Sportline 2PiF


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 1000X vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 HGX


Penn FIERCE IV 3000X vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2000-PX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 1000DX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 1000X vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX


Daiwa Ninja LT 6000X vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2000-PX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000-XHX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 HGX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa BG 8000X


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2500X


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000-XHX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2000-PX vs Shimano Aero BB 4000X


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX vs Delphin ELIXIR 4000X


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 1000X vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2000-PX


Penn FIERCE IV 3000X vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CXHX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2000-PX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 1000X
