Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX vs Daiwa TD FEEDER QD
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Abu GARCIA Zenon
Spinning
85.70 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.55 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight135g / 4.76oz
Line retireve per crank63 centimeter / 24.8 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandABU GARCIA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €326.00
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000 S
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.17/100

Daiwa TD FEEDER QD
Feeder And Match
61.30 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.72 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio4.9:1
Maximum drag8kg
Weight440g / 15.52oz
Line retireve per crank87 centimeter
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €95.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4012
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.29/150
Conclusion
Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX clearly outshines Daiwa TD FEEDER QD, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and weight (135g / 4,76oz). While Daiwa TD FEEDER QD may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Abu GARCIA Zenon and Daiwa TD FEEDER QD?
Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX
- Super lightweight thanks to its score and value 9.1 out of 10 (135g / 4,76oz), great reel for finesse fishing where comfort and control matter the most
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Daiwa TD FEEDER QD
- A line retrieve score of 8.2 out of 10 87 centimeter), this reel offers quick and smooth line pickup, ideal for keeping up during active feeder sessions
- Rated at 8.67 out of 10 (6) for ball bearings, this reel provides smooth and consistent performance.. great for active match anglers
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX vs Shimano 20 Stella 6000 XGX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX vs Shimano 20 Stella 6000 XGX


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX vs Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX


Daiwa 19 Certate 4000CXHX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000 XGX


Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD vs Shimano 20 Stella 6000 XGX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa Nzon Distance 25


Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X


Shimano 20 Stella 6000 XGX vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX vs Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX


Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX vs Shimano Ultegra C2000SHGDX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX vs Shimano AERO XR C5000X


Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX


Shimano AERO XR C5000X vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X
