Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X

Abu GARCIA Zenon
Spinning
86.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.54 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight138g / 4.87oz
Line retireve per crank69 centimeter / 27.17 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandABU GARCIA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €326.00
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000 S
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.17/100

Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF
Spinning
38.20 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.54 out of 10
Ergonomics6.18 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag2.5kg / 5.51lbs
Weight245g / 8.64oz
Line retireve per crank74 centimeter / 29.13 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandCORMORAN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €22.60
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/250
Conclusion
Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x clearly outshines Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and total score (8.6 out of 10). While Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Abu GARCIA Zenon and Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF?
Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x
- Designed with a light drag at 5 out of 10 (3kg / 6,61lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.57 out of 10 (74 centimeter / 29.13 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Delphin INKS 5000X vs Daiwa BG 3000X


Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000S-XH(U)X


Shimano Vanquish FC 2500SCX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX


Delphin INKS 5000X vs Delphin CarbonIX 2000X


Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Delphin IXTREK 5000X


Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X vs Daiwa BG 3000X


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500-XHX


Delphin IXTREK 5000X vs Daiwa RX LT 2000X


Shimano Aero C5000X vs Daiwa RX LT 2000X


Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Delphin CarbonIX 2000X


Delphin IXTREK 5000X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000S-XH(U)X


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX vs Shimano FX 2500 FCX


Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 2000X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000S-XH(U)X


Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CXHX


Daiwa BG 3000X vs Delphin IXTREK 5000X


Daiwa BG 1500X vs Daiwa RX LT 2000X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000S-XH(U)X vs Shimano Aero C5000X


Delphin IXTREK 5000X vs Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX
