Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X

Abu GARCIA Zenon
Spinning
86.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.54 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight138g / 4.87oz
Line retireve per crank69 centimeter / 27.17 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandABU GARCIA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €326.00
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000 S
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.17/100

Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF
Spinning
38.20 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.56 out of 10
Ergonomics6.17 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag2.5kg / 5.51lbs
Weight250g / 8.82oz
Line retireve per crank74 centimeter / 29.13 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandCORMORAN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €23.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/200
Conclusion
Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x clearly outshines Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and total score (8.6 out of 10). While Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Abu GARCIA Zenon and Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF?
Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x
- Designed with a light drag at 5 out of 10 (3kg / 6,61lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.57 out of 10 (74 centimeter / 29.13 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CXHX vs Delphin BRONZ 5000X


Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 5000 HGX


Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 FJX


Delphin ELIXIR 4000X vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CXHX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT4000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 2000X


Shimano Stradic GTM 2500 RC Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX


Shimano Stella FK 1000X vs Delphin ELIXIR 4000X


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000X vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500SHGAX


Shimano Stella FK 1000X vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CXHX


Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 FJX vs Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX


Daiwa Ninja LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT4000-CX


Delphin ELIXIR 4000X vs Shimano Stradic GTM 2500 RC Spinning reel with fighting drag


Daiwa Ninja LT 4000-CX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 5000 HGX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT4000-CX vs Shimano Sienna 1000X


Shimano Sedona FJ C5000XGFJX vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X


Shimano Vanford FA 2500SHGAX vs Delphin ELIXIR 4000X


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000AX


Shimano Stella FK 1000X vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000X


Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X vs Shimano Stradic GTM 2500 RC Spinning reel with fighting drag


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 5000 HGX
