Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX

Abu GARCIA Zenon
Spinning
86.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.54 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight138g / 4.87oz
Line retireve per crank69 centimeter / 27.17 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandABU GARCIA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €326.00
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000 S
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.17/100

Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT
Spinning
78.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.65 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.3 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €196.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Both Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x and Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x offers a maximum drag of 3kg / 6,61lbs, while Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX stands out for a ball bearings of 6. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Abu GARCIA Zenon and Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT?
Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x
- Designed with a light drag at 5 out of 10 (3kg / 6,61lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.3 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Shimano Catana FE C 3000X vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CXHX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2000D-XH 2000D-XHX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500-HX


Penn Battle III 6000X vs Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano Catana FE C 3000X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 4000DX vs Delphin FRIZ


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT4000-CX vs Shimano Stradic GTM 2500 RC Spinning reel with fighting drag


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT4000-CX vs Delphin FRIZ


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500-HX


Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX vs Shimano Twinpower FD 4000M HG 4000MHGX


Shimano Stradic GTM 2500 RC Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Delphin CarbonIX 1000X


Shimano Catana 3000 SRC vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500-XHX vs Delphin FRIZ


Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX


Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX vs Shimano Stradic GTM 2500 RC Spinning reel with fighting drag


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT5000-CX vs Shimano Stradic GTM 2500 RC Spinning reel with fighting drag


Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT5000-CX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500SX


Shimano Catana 3000 SRC vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000D-CX


Delphin FRIZ vs Penn Battle III 6000X
