Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Abu GARCIA Zenon
Spinning
86.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.54 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight138g / 4.87oz
Line retireve per crank69 centimeter / 27.17 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandABU GARCIA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €326.00
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000 S
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.17/100

Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD
Feeder And Match
95.00 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.93 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight305g / 10.76oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €189.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3012
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Both Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x and Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x offers a durability of 9.5 out of 10, while Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X stands out for a ball bearings of 8. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Abu GARCIA Zenon and Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD?
Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X
- This reel provides steady retrieval 79 centimeter / 31.1 inch (6.29 out of 10), good enough for most feeder and match scenarios
- With a ball bearing score of 10 out of 10 (8), this reel feels exceptionally smooth and responsive, an ideal choice for demanding feeder and match fishing
Similar comparisons

Shimano Stella FK 2500 S HGX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD


Delphin REDIX vs Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX


Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X vs Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX


Daiwa TD FEEDER QD vs Daiwa Nzon Distance 25


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X


Daiwa Nzon Distance 25 vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CX


Shimano Stella FK 2500 S HGX vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX


Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX vs Shimano AERO XR C5000X


Daiwa TD FEEDER QD vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX vs Daiwa Nzon Distance 25


Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 1000X vs Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX


Shimano 20 Stella 6000 XGX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CX


Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X


Delphin CarbonIX 2000X vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD


Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX


Daiwa TD FEEDER QD vs Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX


Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX


Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X vs Shimano 20 Stella 6000 XGX
