Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX

Abu GARCIA Zenon
Spinning
86.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.54 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight138g / 4.87oz
Line retireve per crank69 centimeter / 27.17 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandABU GARCIA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €326.00
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000 S
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.17/100

Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT
Spinning
72.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.74 out of 10
Ergonomics6.2 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight240g / 8.47oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €98.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x edges out Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the durability (9.5 out of 10) and the total score (8.6 out of 10). Still, Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX holds its own with strengths like a ball bearings of 6 and a maximum drag of 12kg / 26,46lbs, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Abu GARCIA Zenon and Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT?
Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX


Shimano Stella FK C 5000 XGX vs Shimano FX 4000 FCX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 4000-CX vs Shimano 20 Stella 5000 XGX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX


Delphin BRONZ 6000X vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000SDHAX


Shimano 20 Stella 4000 HGX vs Shimano 20 Stella 5000 XGX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 4000-CX


Shimano 20 Stella 4000 HGX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano Vanquish FC 4000XGCX vs Delphin BRONZ 6000X


Shimano Sahara 4000 R vs Shimano Complex XR 2500X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX vs Shimano 20 Stella 5000 XGX


Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Shimano 20 Stella 4000 HGX


Shimano Stella FK C 5000 XGX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2500X vs Shimano Complex XR 2500X


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2500X vs Shimano Stella FK C 5000 XGX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000SDHAX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX
