Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag

Abu GARCIA Zenon
Spinning
86.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.54 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight138g / 4.87oz
Line retireve per crank69 centimeter / 27.17 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandABU GARCIA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €326.00
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000 S
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.17/100

Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag
Spinning
49.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.13 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag-
Weight260g / 9.17oz
Line retireve per crank80cm / 31.50 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €17.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.25mm/190m
Conclusion
Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x clearly outshines Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and maximum drag (3kg / 6,61lbs). While Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Abu GARCIA Zenon and Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag?
Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x
- Designed with a light drag at 5 out of 10 (3kg / 6,61lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag
- 6.43 out of 10 (80cm / 31.50 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Similar comparisons

Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 6000X


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CXHX vs Penn Battle III 8000 HSX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG vs Daiwa BG 4500X


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 1000X vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 1000D-XH 1000D-XHX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX


Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX


Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X


Daiwa BG 4500X vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500X


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX


Daiwa BG 4500X vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X


Delphin IXPERA 2000X vs Delphin HORNET 30X


Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CXHX vs Delphin HORNET 30X


Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX vs Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG


Penn Battle III 8000 HSX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 5000 HGX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 6000X vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX


Delphin HORNET 30X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 5000 HGX
