Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x vs Shimano Catana FE 4000X

Abu GARCIA Zenon
Spinning
86.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.54 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight138g / 4.87oz
Line retireve per crank69 centimeter / 27.17 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandABU GARCIA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €326.00
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000 S
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.17/100

Shimano Catana FE
Spinning
48.90 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.74 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag8.5kg / 18,74lbs
Weight320g / 11.29oz
Line retireve per crank83 centimeter / 32.68 inch
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €34.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/180
Conclusion
Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x clearly outshines Shimano Catana FE 4000X, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and weight (138g / 4,87oz). While Shimano Catana FE 4000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Abu GARCIA Zenon and Shimano Catana FE?
Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x
- Super lightweight thanks to its score and value 9.08 out of 10 (138g / 4,87oz), great reel for finesse fishing where comfort and control matter the most
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Shimano Catana FE 4000X
- 6.86 out of 10 (83 centimeter / 32.68 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 3000D-CXH 3000D-CXHX vs Shimano Ultegra C3000DX


Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 XGX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX


Daiwa RX LT 2000X vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 1000X


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 4000DX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000X vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 5000DX


Shimano 20 Stella 4000 XGX vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 1000X


Shimano Catana FE C 3000X vs Shimano Ultegra C3000DX


Shimano Catana FE C 3000X vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 1000X


Daiwa Crossfire LT 1000X vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 5000DX


Daiwa Crossfire LT 1000X vs Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 3000X


Shimano Catana FE C 3000X vs Delphin IXTREK 4000X


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 5000DX


Shimano Complex XR 2500X vs Daiwa RX LT 2000X


Shimano 20 Stella 4000 XGX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CXHX


Daiwa Crossfire LT 1000X vs Shimano 20 Stella 4000 XGX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX vs Delphin IXTREK 4000X


Daiwa RX LT 2000X vs Shimano Catana FE C 3000X


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 4000-CX


Shimano Complex XR 2500X vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 XGX


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 4000-CX vs Delphin BRONZ 5000X
