Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX

Abu GARCIA Zenon
Spinning
74.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.52 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag5.2kg / 11,46lbs
Weight143g / 5.04oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandABU GARCIA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €326.00
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500 S
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.17/170

Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT
Spinning
81.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.6 out of 10
Ergonomics6.45 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight165g / 5.82oz
Line retireve per crank68 centimeter / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €181.70
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil-
Conclusion
Both Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX and Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX offers a line retrieve per crank of 73 centimeter / 28.74 inch, while Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX stands out for a ball bearings of 6. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Abu GARCIA Zenon and Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT?
Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.43 out of 10 (73 centimeter / 28.74 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX
- A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (5kg / 11,02lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Shimano Catana FE 2500X vs Shimano Complex XR C2000X


Penn FIERCE IV 2000X vs Shimano Catana 2500 RC


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 4000D-CX vs Shimano Catana FE 2500X


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 4000-CX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000X


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 3000D-CXH 3000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 3000D-CXH 3000D-CXHX vs Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 5000D-C 5000D-CX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 4000D-CX


Penn FIERCE IV 2000X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX vs Shimano Twinpower FD 4000M HG 4000MHGX


Penn Battle III 3000X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 3000D-CXH 3000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 5000D-C 5000D-CX


Shimano Twinpower FD 4000M HG 4000MHGX vs Shimano Catana 2500 RC


Shimano Catana 2500 RC vs Shimano Complex XR C2000X


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000X vs Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X


Daiwa Ninja LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500-XHX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 5000D-C 5000D-CX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000X vs Daiwa Ninja LT 5000-CX


Shimano Vanford FA C2500SAX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500-XHX


Shimano Catana FE 2500X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500-XHX


Shimano Twinpower FD 4000M HG 4000MHGX vs Shimano Vanford FA C2500SAX
