Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X

Abu GARCIA Zenon
Spinning
74.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.52 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag5.2kg / 11,46lbs
Weight143g / 5.04oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandABU GARCIA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €326.00
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500 S
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.17/170

Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT
Spinning
56.50 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.33 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight200g / 7.05oz
Line retireve per crank68 centimeter / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings5
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €65.20
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/150
Conclusion
Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX edges out Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X with slightly better overall performance, especially on the durability (9.5 out of 10) and the total score (7.49 out of 10). Still, Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X holds its own with strengths like a ball bearings of 5 and a maximum drag of 5kg / 11,02lbs, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Abu GARCIA Zenon and Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT?
Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.43 out of 10 (73 centimeter / 28.74 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X
- A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (5kg / 11,02lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
- Landing a score of 8 out of 10 (5) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500X


Penn Battle III 2000X vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-CXH(U)X vs Penn Battle III 2000X


Daiwa 21 Presso LT 2000 SS-PX vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2000X


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX


Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2000X


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500X vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2000X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-CXH(U)X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 3000-C / JB4 0.19MM YELLOW 3000-CX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 3000-C / JB4 0.19MM YELLOW 3000-CX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 3000-C / JB4 0.19MM YELLOW 3000-CX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X vs Penn Battle III 2000X


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX


Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CX


Shimano Stella FK C 3000 M HGX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500X


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 4000D-CX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 HGX


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 HGX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 3000-C / JB4 0.19MM YELLOW 3000-CX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-CXH(U)X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500X


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CX
