Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.
Abu GARCIA Zenon
Spinning
74.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.52 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag5.2kg / 11,46lbs
Weight143g / 5.04oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandABU GARCIA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €326.00
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500 S
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.17/170
Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD
Feeder And Match
87.30 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight430g / 15.17oz
Line retireve per crank96 centimeter / 37.8 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €209.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD edges out Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs) and the ball bearings (4). Still, Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX holds its own with strengths like a weight of 143g / 5,04oz and a durability of 9.5 out of 10, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Abu GARCIA Zenon and Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD?
Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX
- Super lightweight thanks to its score and value 9.05 out of 10 (143g / 5,04oz), great reel for finesse fishing where comfort and control matter the most
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD
- With a maximum drag of 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), this reel offers excellent stopping power, giving fishermen the confidence to handle pressure situations with ease
- A ball bearing score of 7 out of 10 (4), makes this reel runs fairly smooth, offering reliable fishing for general feeder and match cases
Similar comparisons
Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X
Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000 HGX
Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX
Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000 HGX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X
Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX
Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X vs Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI
Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX
Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa TD FEEDER QD
Daiwa Nzon Distance 25 vs Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI
Daiwa Nzon Distance 25 vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X
Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD
Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX
Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX
Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX
Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX
Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX
Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX vs Daiwa TD FEEDER QD
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000 HGX
Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD
Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X vs Daiwa TD FEEDER QD