Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 6000X
Abu GARCIA Zenon
Spinning
74.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.52 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag5.2kg / 11,46lbs
Weight143g / 5.04oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandABU GARCIA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €326.00
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500 S
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.17/170
Daiwa 20 Fuego LT
Spinning
64.20 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.68 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight335g / 11.82oz
Line retireve per crank92 centimeter / 36.22 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €86.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size6000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.4/150
Conclusion
Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX edges out Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 6000X with slightly better overall performance, especially on the durability (9.5 out of 10) and the weight (143g / 5,04oz). Still, Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 6000X holds its own with strengths like a maximum drag of 12kg / 26,46lbs and a ball bearings of 6, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Abu GARCIA Zenon and Daiwa 20 Fuego LT?
Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX
- Super lightweight thanks to its score and value 9.05 out of 10 (143g / 5,04oz), great reel for finesse fishing where comfort and control matter the most
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 6000X
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT4000-CX
Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 3000-HX
Daiwa BG 1500X vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X
Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CX
Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 1000X
Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 3000-HX
Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 1000DX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX
Shimano Twin Power XD A C 5000 XGX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX
Daiwa 23 Revros LT 1000X vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX
Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 1000DX vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CX
Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 1000DX
Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X
Shimano Twin Power XD A C 5000 XGX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX
Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 1000DX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX
Daiwa 23 Revros LT 1000X vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 3000-HX
Penn FIERCE IV 2500X vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CX
Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX
Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X
Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CX vs Penn FIERCE IV 2500X