Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X

Abu GARCIA Zenon
Spinning
74.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.52 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag5.2kg / 11,46lbs
Weight143g / 5.04oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandABU GARCIA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €326.00
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500 S
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.17/170

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT
Spinning
78.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.63 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank67 centimeter / 26.38 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €189.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/150
Conclusion
Both Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX and Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX offers a durability of 9.5 out of 10, while Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X stands out for a ball bearings of 6. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Abu GARCIA Zenon and Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT?
Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.43 out of 10 (73 centimeter / 28.74 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI vs Daiwa BG 3000X


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 2500DX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT4000-CX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X


Cormoran Spoon Trout 8PiF vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX


Cormoran Spoon Trout 8PiF vs Daiwa BG 3500X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT4000-CX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X vs Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX vs Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX


Daiwa Lexa E LT 19 3000X vs Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 2500DX vs Daiwa BG 3500X


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500-DX vs Daiwa Lexa E LT 19 3000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CX vs Cormoran Spoon Trout 8PiF


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX vs Daiwa BG 3000X


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X vs Daiwa BG 3000X


Daiwa BG 3000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CX


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX vs Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 2000 S-PX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT4000-CX vs Daiwa BG 3000X


Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI vs Cormoran Spoon Trout 8PiF


Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 2000X vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX


Cormoran Spoon Trout 8PiF vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX
