Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X

Abu GARCIA Zenon
Spinning
74.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.52 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag5.2kg / 11,46lbs
Weight143g / 5.04oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandABU GARCIA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €326.00
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500 S
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.17/170

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT
Spinning
78.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.63 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank67 centimeter / 26.38 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €189.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/150
Conclusion
Both Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX and Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX offers a durability of 9.5 out of 10, while Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X stands out for a ball bearings of 6. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Abu GARCIA Zenon and Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT?
Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.43 out of 10 (73 centimeter / 28.74 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000X vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 500X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500X vs Cormoran Spoon Trout 8PiF


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 1000FJX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000D(U)X vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 XGX


Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X vs Shimano Sedona FJ 1000FJX


Daiwa 21 Presso LT 2000 SS-PX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX


Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 XGX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX


Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000X


Shimano Sedona FJ 1000FJX vs Cormoran Spoon Trout 8PiF


Daiwa 21 Presso LT 2000 SS-PX vs Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X


Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 2000 S-PX vs Daiwa 21 Presso LT 2000 SS-PX


Cormoran Spoon Trout 8PiF vs Daiwa 21 Presso LT 2000 SS-PX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500X


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 500X vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 XGX


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500X


Cormoran Spoon Trout 8PiF vs Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000X


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 2000 S-PX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 XGX


Shimano Sedona FJ 1000FJX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 500X
