Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX

Abu GARCIA Zenon
Spinning
74.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.52 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag5.2kg / 11,46lbs
Weight143g / 5.04oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandABU GARCIA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €326.00
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500 S
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.17/170

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
78.80 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.43 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight170g / 6oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €151.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/150
Conclusion
Both Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX and Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX offers a line retrieve per crank of 73 centimeter / 28.74 inch, while Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX stands out for a ball bearings of 6. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Abu GARCIA Zenon and Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)?
Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.43 out of 10 (73 centimeter / 28.74 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX
- A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (5kg / 11,02lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa RX LT 2500X vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CXHX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2000D-XH 2000D-XHX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT4000-CX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000HGFJX


Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 2000 S-PX vs Daiwa RX LT 2500X


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CXHX


Delphin MonoDRAG 4000X vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 1000X


Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 2000 S-PX vs Shimano Stella FK C 5000 XGX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2000D-XH 2000D-XHX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 2000 S-PX vs Delphin CarbonIX 3000X


Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG vs Daiwa RX LT 2500X


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CXHX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX


Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX


Shimano Sienna 2500X vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2000D-XH 2000D-XHX


Shimano Stella FK C 5000 XGX vs Delphin HORNET 30X


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 3000-HX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CXHX


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 1000X vs Shimano Sienna 2500X


Daiwa RX LT 2500X vs Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT4000-CX vs Shimano Stella FK C 5000 XGX
