Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X
Abu GARCIA Zenon
Spinning
74.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.52 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag5.2kg / 11,46lbs
Weight143g / 5.04oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandABU GARCIA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €326.00
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500 S
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.17/170
Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT
Spinning
63.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.69 out of 10
Ergonomics6.4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight180g / 6.35oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €89.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/150
Conclusion
Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX edges out Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X with slightly better overall performance, especially on the durability (9.5 out of 10) and the line retrieve per crank (73 centimeter / 28.74 inch). Still, Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X holds its own with strengths like a ball bearings of 6 and a maximum drag of 5kg / 11,02lbs, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Abu GARCIA Zenon and Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT?
Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.43 out of 10 (73 centimeter / 28.74 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X
- A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (5kg / 11,02lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons
Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X
Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000D-CX
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX vs Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX
Shimano 21 Sustain 5000 XGFJX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX
Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-HX
Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 5000 XGFJX
Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX
Shimano Aero 4000X vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 HGX
Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX vs Mitchell 308 PRO 2000X
Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CX
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 4000D-CXH 4000D-CXHX
Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 HGX
Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX
Shimano Aero 4000X vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 3000X
Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 3000X
Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX vs Shimano Super 4000 GT RD
Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 HGX vs Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 5000-CX
Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X