Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX vs Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 2000 S-PX

Abu GARCIA Zenon
Spinning
74.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.52 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag5.2kg / 11,46lbs
Weight143g / 5.04oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandABU GARCIA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €326.00
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500 S
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.17/170

Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT
Spinning
58.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.73 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio4.8:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank63 centimeter / 24.8 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €97.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000 S-P
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/150
Conclusion
Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX edges out Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 2000 S-PX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the durability (9.5 out of 10) and the gear ratio (5.2:1). Still, Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 2000 S-PX holds its own with strengths like a ball bearings of 6 and a maximum drag of 5kg / 11,02lbs, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Abu GARCIA Zenon and Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT?
Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.43 out of 10 (73 centimeter / 28.74 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 2000 S-PX
- A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (5kg / 11,02lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Daiwa RX LT 2000X vs Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX


Delphin HORNET 60X vs Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X


Daiwa RX LT 2000X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX


Shimano 21 Sahara FJ C3000HGFJX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X


Penn Battle III 3000X vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X vs Penn Battle III 3000X


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX vs Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500X vs Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X


Penn FIERCE IV 2000X vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500X vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500HGAX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX vs Shimano Aero BB 4000X


Shimano 21 Sahara FJ C3000HGFJX vs Penn Battle III 3000X


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500X


Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2000DX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500X vs Delphin HORNET 60X


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500X vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX
