Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2000X

Abu GARCIA Zenon
Spinning
74.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.52 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag5.2kg / 11,46lbs
Weight143g / 5.04oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandABU GARCIA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €326.00
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500 S
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.17/170

Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT
Spinning
56.60 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.35 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight195g / 6878oz
Line retireve per crank68 centimeter / 26772 inch
Ball bearings5
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €62.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/150
Conclusion
Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX edges out Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2000X with slightly better overall performance, especially on the durability (9.5 out of 10) and the total score (7.49 out of 10). Still, Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2000X holds its own with strengths like a ball bearings of 5 and a maximum drag of 5kg / 11,02lbs, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Abu GARCIA Zenon and Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT?
Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.43 out of 10 (73 centimeter / 28.74 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2000X
- A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (5kg / 11,02lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
- Landing a score of 8 out of 10 (5) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Penn FIERCE IV 2000X vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2000DX


Penn Battle III 3000X vs Shimano Sienna 4000X


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000CXHX vs Shimano Aero C3000X


Shimano 19 Stella 10000 PGX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X


Penn Battle III 3000X vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Aero BB 4000X vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CXHX


Mitchell 308 PRO 2000X vs Shimano Aero BB 4000X


Penn FIERCE IV 2000X vs Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X


Daiwa Ninja LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX


Shimano Aero C3000X vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000CXHX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 1000DX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 5000-CX vs Shimano Aero BB 4000X


Shimano Aero BB 4000X vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000CXHX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 1000DX vs Penn Battle III 3000X


Shimano Complex XR 2500 HGX vs Mitchell 308 PRO 2000X


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CXHX vs Mitchell 308 PRO 2000X


Shimano Aero BB 4000X vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Complex XR 2500 HGX
