Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX vs Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX
Abu GARCIA Zenon
Spinning
74.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.52 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag5.2kg / 11,46lbs
Weight143g / 5.04oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandABU GARCIA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €326.00
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500 S
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.17/170
Penn Battle III Long Cast
Spinning
8000 Lcx
53.60 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.59 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio4.0:1
Maximum drag13.6kg / 29,98lbs
Weight748g / 26.39oz
Line retireve per crank94 centimeter / 37.01 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €177.40
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size8000 LC
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.35/485
Conclusion
Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX clearly outshines Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX, offering significantly better performance in weight (143g / 5,04oz) and durability (9.5 out of 10). While Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Abu GARCIA Zenon and Penn Battle III Long Cast?
Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- Super lightweight thanks to its score and value 9.05 out of 10 (143g / 5,04oz), great reel for finesse fishing where comfort and control matter the most
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX
- For 8 out of 10 (13,6kg / 29,98lbs) in drag score, the reel holds up well when you're battling strong fish or fishing near heavy cover
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons
Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX
Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 1000X
Shimano Stradic GTM 4000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX
Delphin HORNET 40X vs Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R
Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CX
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX vs Shimano Stella FK 2500 SX
Shimano Catana 1000 RC vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX
Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 1000X
Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CXHX
Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 1000X
Daiwa 23 Revros LT 1000X vs Shimano Stella FK 2500 SX
Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX
Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R vs Delphin HORNET 40X
Shimano 19 Stella 20000 PGX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2000DX
Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 HGX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CXHX
Shimano Stradic GTM 4000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Shimano Stella FK 2500 SX
Daiwa 23 Revros LT 1000X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X
Daiwa 23 Revros LT 1000X vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 3000-CX
Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Stella FK 2500 SX
Shimano Catana 1000 RC vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CXHX