Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX vs Penn Battle III 8000 HSX

Abu GARCIA Zenon
Spinning
74.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.52 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag5.2kg / 11,46lbs
Weight143g / 5.04oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandABU GARCIA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €326.00
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500 S
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.17/170

Penn Battle III
Spinning
69.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag13.6kg / 29,98lbs
Weight785g / 27.7oz
Line retireve per crank112 centimeter / 44.09 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €127.60
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size8000 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.46/335
Conclusion
Both Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX and Penn Battle III 8000 HSX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX offers a weight of 143g / 5,04oz, while Penn Battle III 8000 HSX stands out for a ball bearings of 6. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Abu GARCIA Zenon and Penn Battle III?
Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX
- Super lightweight thanks to its score and value 9.05 out of 10 (143g / 5,04oz), great reel for finesse fishing where comfort and control matter the most
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.43 out of 10 (73 centimeter / 28.74 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
Penn Battle III 8000 HSX
- For 8 out of 10 (13,6kg / 29,98lbs) in drag score, the reel holds up well when you're battling strong fish or fishing near heavy cover
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500X vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500X-HX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2500D-XH 2500D-XHX vs Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500X


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2500X vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500X-HX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX


Daiwa Ninja LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2500X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI


Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2500D-XH 2500D-XHX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX


Shimano Aero BB 4000X vs Shimano Sahara 2500 R


Shimano Sahara 2500 R vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano Sahara 2500 R vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Sahara 2500 R


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CXHX


Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2500X vs Shimano Sahara 2500 R


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2500D-XH 2500D-XHX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano Sahara 2500 R vs Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2500D-XH 2500D-XHX
