Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX vs Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX

Abu GARCIA Zenon
Spinning
74.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.52 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag5.2kg / 11,46lbs
Weight143g / 5.04oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandABU GARCIA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €326.00
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500 S
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.17/170

Shimano Catana FE
Spinning
53.70 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.74 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.8:1
Maximum drag8.5kg / 18,74lbs
Weight320g / 11.29oz
Line retireve per crank93 centimeter / 36.61 inch
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €34.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 HG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/180
Conclusion
Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX clearly outshines Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and weight (143g / 5,04oz). While Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Abu GARCIA Zenon and Shimano Catana FE?
Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX
- Super lightweight thanks to its score and value 9.05 out of 10 (143g / 5,04oz), great reel for finesse fishing where comfort and control matter the most
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX
- A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (8,5kg / 18,74lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Shimano Sedona FJ 2500SFJX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 4000D-CX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX


Cormoran Sportline 2PiF vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CXHX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500SFJX


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 2000X vs Shimano 21 Sustain 5000 XGFJX


Shimano 21 Sustain 5000 XGFJX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CXHX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 4000D-CX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 4000-CX


Cormoran Sportline 2PiF vs Daiwa Ninja LT 4000-CX


Daiwa RX LT 1000X vs Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500SFJX vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 2000X


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 2000X vs Cormoran Sportline 2PiF


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 4000D-CX


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX vs Daiwa RX LT 1000X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CX


Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CXHX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 2000X vs Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX
