Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX vs Shimano Catana FE 4000X

Abu GARCIA Zenon
Spinning
74.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.52 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag5.2kg / 11,46lbs
Weight143g / 5.04oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandABU GARCIA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €326.00
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500 S
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.17/170

Shimano Catana FE
Spinning
48.90 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.74 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag8.5kg / 18,74lbs
Weight320g / 11.29oz
Line retireve per crank83 centimeter / 32.68 inch
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €34.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/180
Conclusion
Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX clearly outshines Shimano Catana FE 4000X, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and weight (143g / 5,04oz). While Shimano Catana FE 4000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Abu GARCIA Zenon and Shimano Catana FE?
Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX
- Super lightweight thanks to its score and value 9.05 out of 10 (143g / 5,04oz), great reel for finesse fishing where comfort and control matter the most
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Shimano Catana FE 4000X
- A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (8,5kg / 18,74lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Shimano Catana FE C 3000X vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX vs Shimano 20 Stella 4000 HGX


Shimano Catana FE C 3000X vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX


Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X vs Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 1000 S-PX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 1000 S-PX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX


Shimano 21 Sahara FJ C3000HGFJX vs Daiwa Certate LT 19 5000D-XHX


Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000HGAX


Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX


Shimano Sienna 2500X vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX


Shimano 21 Sahara FJ C3000HGFJX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX


Shimano 21 Sahara FJ C3000HGFJX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CX


Shimano 20 Stella 4000 HGX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500X


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX


Shimano 20 Stella 4000 HGX vs Shimano Catana FE 2500X


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX vs Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 1000 S-PX


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CX


Shimano Catana FE C 3000X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX
