Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX vs Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX

Abu GARCIA Zenon

Spinning

74.90 out of 100

Value for money4 out of 5

Quality classExcellent

Durability9.5 out of 10

Ergonomics6.52 out of 10

Gear ratio5.2:1

Maximum drag5.2kg / 11,46lbs

Weight143g / 5.04oz

Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch

Ball bearings11

Technical Specifications

BrandABU GARCIA
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €326.00
Is saltwater resistantYes
Spare spoolNo
Reel size2500 S
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.17/170

Shimano FX

Spinning

62.20 out of 100

Value for money4 out of 5

Quality classLow

Durability2.5 out of 10

Ergonomics6.17 out of 10

Gear ratio6.2:1

Maximum drag4kg / 8.82lbs

Weight250g / 8.82oz

Line retireve per crank88 centimeter / 34.65 inch

Ball bearings3+1

Technical Specifications

BrandSHIMANO
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €18.33
Is saltwater resistantNo
Spare spoolNo
Reel size2500 HG FC
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/160

Conclusion

Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX edges out Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the durability (9.5 out of 10) and the total score (7.49 out of 10). Still, Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX holds its own with strengths like a ball bearings of 3+1 and a line retrieve per crank of 88 centimeter / 34.65 inch, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.

What's the difference between Abu GARCIA Zenon and Shimano FX?

Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX

Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.

Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX

Designed with a light drag at 5.69 out of 10 (4kg / 8,82lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues