Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX vs Shimano Sienna 1000X

Abu GARCIA Zenon
Spinning
74.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.52 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag5.2kg / 11,46lbs
Weight143g / 5.04oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandABU GARCIA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €326.00
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500 S
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.17/170

Shimano Sienna
Spinning
49.10 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.62 out of 10
Ergonomics6.25 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight225g / 7.94oz
Line retireve per crank66 centimeter / 25.98 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €27.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/140
Conclusion
Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX clearly outshines Shimano Sienna 1000X, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and total score (7.49 out of 10). While Shimano Sienna 1000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Abu GARCIA Zenon and Shimano Sienna?
Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.43 out of 10 (73 centimeter / 28.74 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Shimano Sienna 1000X
- Designed with a light drag at 5 out of 10 (3kg / 6,61lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Daiwa Freams LT 6000D-HX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X


Shimano Sedona 8000 FI vs Shimano 19 Stella 8000 HGX


Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2000X


Shimano 19 Stella 10000 PGX vs Daiwa Freams LT 6000D-HX


Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X vs Shimano Sedona 8000 FI


Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R vs Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R


Shimano FX 3000 FCX vs Shimano FX 4000 FCX


Shimano FX 3000 FCX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X vs Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2000X vs Delphin INKS 4000X


Daiwa Ninja LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX


Daiwa Ninja LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 4000-CX


Delphin INKS 4000X vs Daiwa Freams LT 6000D-HX


Shimano FX 3000 FCX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000X


Daiwa Crossfire LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Delphin INKS 4000X vs Shimano Vanford FA C2500SAX


Daiwa Ninja LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano Vanford FA C2500SAX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX vs Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-C(U)X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2000X


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X vs Shimano Vanford FA C2500SAX
