Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX vs Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI

Abu GARCIA Zenon
Spinning
74.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.52 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag5.2kg / 11,46lbs
Weight143g / 5.04oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandABU GARCIA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €326.00
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500 S
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.17/170

Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI
Spinning
68.90 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.17 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84 lbs
Weight250g / 8.82oz
Line retireve per crank91cm / 35.83 inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €52.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC3000 HG
- Handle typeHandle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.25/210. 0.30/130, 0.35/100 lb/yds: 6/230, 8/170, 10/140
Conclusion
Both Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX and Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX offers a durability of 9.5 out of 10, while Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI stands out for a maximum drag of 9kg / 19.84 lbs. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Abu GARCIA Zenon and Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI?
Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI
- With a great drag score 9.2 out of 10 (9kg / 19.84 lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 4000-XHX vs Shimano Aero C5000X


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2500SX vs Shimano Twinpower FD 4000M HG 4000MHGX


Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X vs Shimano 21 Sahara FJ C3000HGFJX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2500SX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 1000DX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2500SX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX


Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2500SX


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000-XHX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000-XHX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 FJX


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500SFJX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000-XHX


Shimano Vanford FA C3000SDHAX vs Cormoran Sportline 2PiF


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 4000-XHX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 FJX


Shimano 21 Sahara FJ C3000HGFJX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 1000DX


Shimano Twinpower FD 4000M HG 4000MHGX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX


Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 FJX vs Shimano 21 Sahara FJ C3000HGFJX


Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 3000X vs Cormoran Sportline 2PiF


Shimano Aero C5000X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2500SX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 1000DX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 5000XGFEX
