Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX vs Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Abu GARCIA Zenon
Spinning
83.30 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.47 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag5.2kg / 11,46lbs
Weight160g / 5.64oz
Line retireve per crank96 centimeter / 37.8 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandABU GARCIA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €326.00
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 SH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.33/150

Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF
Feeder And Match
51.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.68 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio5.5:1
Maximum drag-
Weight375g / 13.23oz
Line retireve per crank95 centimeter / 37.4 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandCORMORAN
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €30.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size5000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/230
Conclusion
Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX clearly outshines Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and weight (160g / 5,64oz). While Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Abu GARCIA Zenon and Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF?
Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX
- With a score like 8.93 out of 10 (160g / 5,64oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF
- A ball bearing score of 7 out of 10 (4), makes this reel runs fairly smooth, offering reliable fishing for general feeder and match cases
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500X vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000CXHX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X


Shimano AERO XR C5000X vs Abu GARCIA SUPERIOR 2500SX


Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X


Shimano AERO XR C3000X vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500X


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT4000-CX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CX


Shimano AERO XR C5000X vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X vs Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG


Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500X


Shimano AERO XR C5000X vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X


Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX


Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000CXHX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX


Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX


Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500X


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X


Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X
