Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Abu GARCIA Zenon
Spinning
83.30 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.47 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag5.2kg / 11,46lbs
Weight160g / 5.64oz
Line retireve per crank96 centimeter / 37.8 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandABU GARCIA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €326.00
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 SH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.33/150

Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD
Feeder And Match
87.30 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight430g / 15.17oz
Line retireve per crank96 centimeter / 37.8 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €209.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Both Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX and Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX offers a weight of 160g / 5,64oz, while Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD stands out for a maximum drag of 12kg / 26,46lbs. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Abu GARCIA Zenon and Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD?
Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX
- With a score like 8.93 out of 10 (160g / 5,64oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD
- With a maximum drag of 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), this reel offers excellent stopping power, giving fishermen the confidence to handle pressure situations with ease
- A ball bearing score of 7 out of 10 (4), makes this reel runs fairly smooth, offering reliable fishing for general feeder and match cases
Similar comparisons

Shimano 21 Nexave FI 5000 HGX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX


Delphin IXTREK 5000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX


Delphin SHARX 3000X vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500X


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 5000-CX


Delphin SHARX 3000X vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 5000 HGX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2000X


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 5000 HGX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 5000 HGX vs Delphin IXTREK 5000X


Delphin SHARX 3000X vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD


Delphin IXTREK 5000X vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX
