Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X

Abu GARCIA Zenon
Spinning
83.30 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.47 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag5.2kg / 11,46lbs
Weight160g / 5.64oz
Line retireve per crank96 centimeter / 37.8 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandABU GARCIA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €326.00
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 SH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.33/150

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT
Spinning
78.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.63 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank67 centimeter / 26.38 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €189.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/150
Conclusion
Both Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX and Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX offers a line retrieve per crank of 96 centimeter / 37.8 inch, while Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X stands out for a ball bearings of 6. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Abu GARCIA Zenon and Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT?
Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX
- A high retrieve rate of 9.1 out of 10 (96 centimeter / 37.8 inch), means the reel is made just for speed, perfect for speed fishing or covering water quickly
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 1000X


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500D-HX vs Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX vs Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX


Daiwa BG 6500X vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000D-CX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500D-HX


Delphin CarbonIX 3000X vs Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX


Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CX


Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX


Delphin CarbonIX 3000X vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 5000-CX


Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X vs Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT6000X vs Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX


Shimano Stradic FM 1000FMX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 5000-CX


Daiwa BG 6500X vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 1000X


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 1000X vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500D-HX


Shimano Vanford FA C3000XGAX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT6000X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX vs Daiwa BG 6500X


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI


Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa BG 6500X


Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX vs Delphin HORNET 30X
