Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX

Abu GARCIA Zenon
Spinning
83.30 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.47 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag5.2kg / 11,46lbs
Weight160g / 5.64oz
Line retireve per crank96 centimeter / 37.8 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandABU GARCIA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €326.00
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 SH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.33/150

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
78.80 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.43 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight170g / 6oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €151.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/150
Conclusion
Both Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX and Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX offers a line retrieve per crank of 96 centimeter / 37.8 inch, while Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX stands out for a ball bearings of 6. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Abu GARCIA Zenon and Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)?
Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX
- A high retrieve rate of 9.1 out of 10 (96 centimeter / 37.8 inch), means the reel is made just for speed, perfect for speed fishing or covering water quickly
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX
- A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (5kg / 11,02lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Delphin BRONZ 5000X vs Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX


Shimano Vanquish FC 4000XGCX vs Shimano Catana FE 1000X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI


Shimano Twin Power FE 5000XGFEX vs Shimano Stella FK 2500X


Shimano Stella FK 2500X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 4000-C(U)X


Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 4000-C(U)X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 2500DX


Shimano Twin Power FE 5000XGFEX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 4000-C(U)X


Delphin FRIZ vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500 HGX vs Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF


Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF vs Delphin BRONZ 5000X


Shimano Twin Power FE 5000XGFEX vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 2500X


Shimano Stella FK 2500 S HGX vs Delphin BRONZ 5000X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 4000-C(U)X


Daiwa Freams LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 2500DX


Shimano Stella FK 2500X vs Daiwa Freams LT 2500DX


Shimano Stella FK 2500X vs Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX


Shimano Catana FE 1000X vs Shimano Stella FK 2500 S HGX


Shimano Catana FE 1000X vs Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF
