Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX

Abu GARCIA Zenon
Spinning
83.30 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.47 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag5.2kg / 11,46lbs
Weight160g / 5.64oz
Line retireve per crank96 centimeter / 37.8 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandABU GARCIA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €326.00
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 SH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.33/150

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
79.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.53 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank67 centimeter / 26.38 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €159.80
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150
Conclusion
Both Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX and Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX offers a line retrieve per crank of 96 centimeter / 37.8 inch, while Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX stands out for a ball bearings of 6. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Abu GARCIA Zenon and Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)?
Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX
- A high retrieve rate of 9.1 out of 10 (96 centimeter / 37.8 inch), means the reel is made just for speed, perfect for speed fishing or covering water quickly
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX
- A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (5kg / 11,02lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 1000D-XH 1000D-XHX


Shimano Vanquish FC C2000SCX vs Delphin INKS 2000X


Shimano Vanquish FC C2000SCX vs Shimano Vanquish FC C5000XGCX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 3000DX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 1000D-XH 1000D-XHX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500SX


Delphin INKS 2000X vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X


Daiwa RX LT 1000X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CXHX


Penn Battle III 2000X vs Shimano Vanquish FC C2000SCX


Shimano Stella FK 2500 HGX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500SX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X


Shimano Sahara FJ 500X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX


Penn Battle III 2000X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 3000DX


Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX


Penn Battle III 2000X vs Delphin BRONZ 6000X


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 3000DX vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 1000D-XH 1000D-XHX vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 4000D-CX


Delphin INKS 2000X vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500SX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2500SX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CXHX
