Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX

Abu GARCIA Zenon

Spinning

83.30 out of 100

Value for money4.5 out of 5

Quality classExcellent

Durability9.5 out of 10

Ergonomics6.47 out of 10

Gear ratio6.2:1

Maximum drag5.2kg / 11,46lbs

Weight160g / 5.64oz

Line retireve per crank96 centimeter / 37.8 inch

Ball bearings11

Technical Specifications

BrandABU GARCIA
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €326.00
Is saltwater resistantYes
Spare spoolNo
Reel size4000 SH
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.33/150

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)

Spinning

85.50 out of 100

Value for money4.5 out of 5

Quality classGood

Durability8.53 out of 10

Ergonomics6.42 out of 10

Gear ratio5.8:1

Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs

Weight175g / 6.17oz

Line retireve per crank76 centimeter / 29.92 inch

Ball bearings6

Technical Specifications

BrandDAIWA
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €159.80
Is saltwater resistantYes
Spare spoolNo
Reel size2000S-H
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/150

Conclusion

Both Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX and Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX offers a line retrieve per crank of 96 centimeter / 37.8 inch, while Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX stands out for a ball bearings of 6. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.

What's the difference between Abu GARCIA Zenon and Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)?

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX

A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (5kg / 11,02lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency