Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT1000X

Abu GARCIA Zenon
Spinning
83.30 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.47 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag5.2kg / 11,46lbs
Weight160g / 5.64oz
Line retireve per crank96 centimeter / 37.8 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandABU GARCIA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €326.00
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 SH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.33/150

Daiwa 23 NINJA LT
Spinning
54.70 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.97 out of 10
Ergonomics6.32 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight205g / 7.23oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €48.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeLT1000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/150
Conclusion
Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX clearly outshines Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT1000X, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and line retrieve per crank (96 centimeter / 37.8 inch). While Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT1000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Abu GARCIA Zenon and Daiwa 23 NINJA LT?
Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX
- A high retrieve rate of 9.1 out of 10 (96 centimeter / 37.8 inch), means the reel is made just for speed, perfect for speed fishing or covering water quickly
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT1000X
- A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (5kg / 11,02lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX


Shimano Stella FK 4000 MX vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 1000X


Shimano Stella FK 4000 MX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX


Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 1000X


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX vs Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX


Daiwa Crossfire LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 4000D-CXH 4000D-CXHX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX vs Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 5000-CX vs Shimano Stella FK 4000 MX


Shimano Stella FK C 5000 XGX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 1000X vs Shimano Stella FK 4000 MX


Shimano Stella FK C 5000 XGX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX


Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 1000X
