Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT6000X

Abu GARCIA Zenon
Spinning
83.30 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.47 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag5.2kg / 11,46lbs
Weight160g / 5.64oz
Line retireve per crank96 centimeter / 37.8 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandABU GARCIA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €326.00
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 SH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.33/150

Daiwa 23 NINJA LT
Spinning
55.90 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight365g / 12.88oz
Line retireve per crank92 centimeter / 36.22 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €59.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeLT6000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.4/150
Conclusion
Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX clearly outshines Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT6000X, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and weight (160g / 5,64oz). While Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT6000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Abu GARCIA Zenon and Daiwa 23 NINJA LT?
Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX
- With a score like 8.93 out of 10 (160g / 5,64oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT6000X
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX


Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2500SX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CX vs Daiwa BG 4000X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano 20 Stella 4000 HGX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X


Shimano Vanford FA 2500HGAX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000D-CX


Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX


Daiwa BG 4000X vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000AX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX


Shimano 20 Stella 4000 HGX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX


Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500-XHX


Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X vs Daiwa BG 4000X


Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X


Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X vs Shimano 20 Stella 4000 HGX


Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500HGAX


Shimano Vanford FA 2500HGAX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX


Daiwa BG 4000X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2500SX vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X
