Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Abu GARCIA Zenon
Spinning
83.30 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.47 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag5.2kg / 11,46lbs
Weight160g / 5.64oz
Line retireve per crank96 centimeter / 37.8 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandABU GARCIA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €326.00
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 SH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.33/150

Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT
Feeder And Match
62.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.62 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight390g / 13.76oz
Line retireve per crank92 centimeter / 36.22 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €75.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size6000SS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150
Conclusion
Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX clearly outshines Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and weight (160g / 5,64oz). While Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Abu GARCIA Zenon and Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT?
Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX
- With a score like 8.93 out of 10 (160g / 5,64oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX
- With a maximum drag of 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), this reel offers excellent stopping power, giving fishermen the confidence to handle pressure situations with ease
- A ball bearing score of 7 out of 10 (4), makes this reel runs fairly smooth, offering reliable fishing for general feeder and match cases
Similar comparisons

Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX vs Shimano AERO XR C5000X


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX vs Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 5000-CX vs Shimano AERO XR C5000X


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD vs Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX


Shimano AERO XR C3000X vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX


Shimano Aero 4000X vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX vs Shimano AERO XR C3000X


Shimano AERO XR C5000X vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX vs Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X vs Shimano Aero 4000X


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-CXH(U)X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-CXH(U)X vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX


Shimano AERO XR C5000X vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Shimano AERO XR C5000X
