Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX vs Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 1000 S-PX

Abu GARCIA Zenon
Spinning
83.30 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.47 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag5.2kg / 11,46lbs
Weight160g / 5.64oz
Line retireve per crank96 centimeter / 37.8 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandABU GARCIA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €326.00
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 SH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.33/150

Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT
Spinning
58.30 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.72 out of 10
Ergonomics6.43 out of 10
Gear ratio4.8:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight170g / 6oz
Line retireve per crank60 centimeter / 23.62 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €94.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000 S-P
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.12/100
Conclusion
Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX clearly outshines Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 1000 S-PX, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and line retrieve per crank (96 centimeter / 37.8 inch). While Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 1000 S-PX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Abu GARCIA Zenon and Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT?
Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX
- A high retrieve rate of 9.1 out of 10 (96 centimeter / 37.8 inch), means the reel is made just for speed, perfect for speed fishing or covering water quickly
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 1000 S-PX
- A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (5kg / 11,02lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2500X


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX vs Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2500X vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500-XHX


Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 4000-C(U)X


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 1000D-XHX


Shimano Aero BB C3000X vs Shimano 20 Stella 5000 HGX


Shimano Aero BB C3000X vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX


Shimano 21 Sustain 5000 XGFJX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 1000D-XHX


Shimano Stella FK 4000 MX vs Shimano Aero BB C3000X


Shimano 21 Sustain 5000 XGFJX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 4000-C(U)X


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX vs Shimano Stella FK 4000 MX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX vs Daiwa BG 5000X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2500X


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX vs Shimano 19 Stella 10000 PGX


Shimano Stella FK 4000 MX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX


Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX
